Two halves of the same job, taught together because that is how they are done. Business analysis works out what is actually needed and why. Project management gets it built, on time, with the receipts. In most organisations one person does both, and this is that person.
Both failures cost the same money and neither is visible until it is too late. The two roles that prevent them are usually held by the same person, which is why they are taught together here. Public industry figures, each one sourced.
Figures describe the industry, not Brixgate outcomes. We are a new programme and we do not have placement statistics to quote yet. When we do, they will appear here with the same sourcing.
Somebody asks for something. First you find out what they actually need and write it so nobody has to guess. Then you plan the work, run it when it goes sideways, and can show afterwards what happened and why. Most courses teach one half and leave you to discover the other on the job.
"We need a dashboard so management can see what is going on."
Reasonable sounding, and impossible to build. Which management, seeing what, deciding what, and how would anyone know if it worked?
Regional managers need to spot stock running out before it does.
Shipped in nine weeks. Two of them late, and the record says why.
You pick a problem in week one and it stays with you. First you work out what is actually needed, then you plan and run the delivery of it. By week twelve you have both halves on paper, and you have defended them to people who pushed back.
People describe solutions, not problems, and they describe the process they wish they followed rather than the one they do. Getting underneath that is a learnable technique.
A requirement that can be read two ways will be built the wrong way. This phase turns the ask into something precise, then turns that into a plan: what happens in what order, what depends on what, and where it will realistically slip.
Every plan meets the week it goes sideways. This is where AI arrives, and where the work gets political: holding the line when someone senior wants something else, and keeping a record that survives the argument afterwards.
For a real problem, with process maps, acceptance criteria and an explicit list of what is out of scope.
The plan, what moved and why, the risks you called early, and the decisions with dates against them.
Saying "that is a solution, what is the problem" to someone senior, and later "that date is not real", with the evidence to make both land.
Free tiers cover everything the twelve weeks require. Tools change between employers; the thinking does not.
Cohorts are kept small on purpose. Dates below come straight from our scheduling system, so what you see here is what is actually open.
Cohorts are small on purpose. When the next Business Analysis intake opens, the waitlist hears before the site does.
We will email you the dates, the timetable and the pricing for the next Business Analysis cohort before any of it goes on the site.
A lot of people take this alongside Project Management, because defining the work and running it are two halves of the same problem.